A new version of RevitLookup is available, and AI influence observable:
Roman @Nice3point Karpovich, aka Роман Карпович, published RevitLookup release 2025.0.9 with important enhancements by himself, RichardPinka and SergeyNefyodov:
The Revit.ini file is a key configuration file in Revit that stores settings related to user preferences, system behavior, and project defaults.
The Revit.ini File Editor provides a simple and efficient way to manage these settings without the need for manual editing. With this tool, users can quickly adjust Revit’s configurations to match project needs or personal preferences, making it an essential utility for both professionals and teams working with Revit.
This is our first public version, and we are excited for you to try it out for yourself! Make sure to file issues you encounter on our GitHub so we can continue to improve it. For more details, please refer to the:
Some users experience issues launching RevitLookup, often caused by conflicts with third-party plugins, cf., issue 269.
To help resolve these issues, we introduced new dependency reporting tools that allow you to analyze, identify and upgrade problematic plugins causing crashes:
Many thanks to @RichardPinka for testing tools in the discussion of issue 281.
Curious about what’s next? Keep up to date on the latest developments for RevitLookup and share your feedback.
Check out the Public RevitLookup Roadmap to see what’s coming up in future releases.
New extensions by @SergeyNefyodov; type, name and short description:
New API support:
New default settings:
Show Static
members enabled by defaultShow Events
enabled by defaultShow Extensions
enabled by defaultBugs:
Miscellaneous:
Shortly after, Roman went on to publish RevitLookup 2025.0.10:
Visual.Enter
methodGenericHost
startup messages by @NefarionIn a different vein, looking at AI-related news, according to scientific studies, LLMs are already influencing human academic language, cf., The Impact of Large Language Models in Academia: from Writing to Speaking. Less scientifically rigorous, similar results are also raised in the El Pais article stating that excessive use of words like ‘commendable’ and ‘meticulous’ suggests ChatGPT has been used in thousands of scientific studies.